Jump to content

latest and greatest stuff

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

This is frickin' awesome, we have come along way from the EECIV monitor setup!

 

Quote:

To: All Ford and Lincoln Mercury Dealerships

Subject: Announcing Powertrain Control/Emissions Diagnosis (PCED) Manual with Interactive Measurements on PTS

 

ANNOUNCEMENT

Ford Customer Service Division (FCSD) and Rotunda Tools are pleased to announce the launch of Powertrain Controls/Emissions Diagnosis (PCED) Manual with Interactive Measurements, available exclusively on the PTS website.

 

Interactive Measurements enable PCED to display vehicle sensor data, such as a Parameter Identification Data (PID), directly within the diagnostic test steps of the Manual. The technician will also have the option to perform and record voltage and resistance measurements within the PCED, as well as actively command vehicle components as needed to support diagnosis.

 

Integrating vehicle diagnostic data with service procedures eliminates the need for the technician to switch between applications and/or separate computer systems in the service bay, saving time. Diagnostic data from the actual vehicle is displayed in the pinpoint test, allowing for quick yes/no decisions.

 

REQUIRED EQUIPMENT

No new software or hardware purchases are required to enable Interactive Measurements. Technicians will need:

 

A computer loaded with IDS version 53 or higher

Internet Explorer 6.0 or higher

Internet access to PTS (wired or wireless internet connection)

VCM (Vehicle Communications Module)

VMM (Vehicle Measurement Module). This is optional and allows interactive voltage/resistance measurements.

VEHICLE COVERAGE

Interactive Measurements are available in the online PCED for the following vehicles:

 

2007-2009 model year Gasoline engine vehicles (except Escape/Mariner Hybrid)

2007-2009 model year Diesel engine vehicles (except 4.5L Diesel Low Cab Forward)

HOW TO GET STARTED

A quick tutorial on using Interactive Measurements is available within the online PCED for each vehicle program featuring Interactive Measurements.

 

Open the PTS website and select a covered vehicle program (as defined above).

Go to the PCED tab for that program.

Select "Click Here to Learn More" on the splash page.

QUESTIONS

Questions regarding Interactive Measurements and supported vehicle programs should be directed to Tony Webb at (313) 323-0333 or twebb16@ford.com.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brad... I can't find mnetiuon of this anywhere on our Canadian server. This could mean that they are only waiting to translate it into French - or it could mean that we will have to wait a while for this to be available in Canada.

 

Quite some time ago, we were chatting about "OASIS Quick Start" and I think I mentioned than that we would most likely see diagnostics get "dumbed down". With this announcement, I find myself running my fingers ever so lightly over the surface of my crystal ball and thinking... here we go....

 

There is every chance that we will soon see "techs" that do nothing more than replace parts at the behest of some nameless, faceless big brother located on the far end of a computer connection....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That looks kinda neat!

 

Anyone know anything about the Protech GCR Rewards thingy? Everything I click on in the popup says "You are not authorized to view this publication".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So basically we have either just been given a great diagnostic tool for those who cant fix shit or we have just received the biggest insult Ford has ever dished out to technicians. Great. Now my fucking cashier can diagnose trucks. Then again... if you have tried to diagnose a 6.4L with the PCED, this might get interesting!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So basically we have either just been given a great diagnostic tool for those who cant fix shit or we have just received the biggest insult Ford has ever dished out to technicians. Great. Now my fucking cashier can diagnose trucks. Then again... if you have tried to diagnose a 6.4L with the PCED, this might get interesting!

Most of us know how this pap plays out in the trenches.... We all know that Ford is going to have us check powers with a voltmeter and an open circuit.... We know they will have us check grounds with with a freakin' ohm-meter.. And we know that there's going to be a lot of self-fulfilling prophecy...

 

Ford is going to take their limp dick circuit tests and cast them in stone.... and they are going to elevate the guys that can't tell these tests are limp dick to better than you are - simply because they can follow orders and come up with bad answers...

 

Guided diagnostics... this is Fords way of telling us we are idiots that can't fix a sandwich. There is a bigger story here... If you need some of it,let me know....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So basically we have either just been given a great diagnostic tool for those who cant fix shit or we have just received the biggest insult Ford has ever dished out to technicians. Great. Now my fucking cashier can diagnose trucks.

You been drinking again? Somebody piss in your Cheerios?

 

 

/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/grin.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No. But I just spent a few hours with my FSE and we talked about this, he said "it" is a disaster. It is meant to help the guys who "need" the help... further explained it likely wont go far. I'll tell my cashier to hold off on those pink cover-alls for now. /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/laugh.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funky ass sh!t. Man, I've got some of the guys here all boiled up about big brother watching over their shoulders and telling them how to do sh!t. /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/smirk.gif /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/poke.gif

 

However, who says we have to actually use it at this point. Might not be a bad aid for Idiots, but I'll just keep doin my own thing for now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: Jim Warman
There is a bigger story here... If you need some of it,let me know....

Don't hold back on us now!

You might recognize this from another thread.... <As for us, there are many techs who have been mis-diagnosing, replacing good parts and abusing the policies. Not all of us but enough to cause problems. Now, we all have to suffer because instead of addressing the problem directly by going after the dealers/technicians who are the problem Ford has changed it's approach entirely.>

 

Enter the "interactive diagnostic process". Why train people? For many, the training wont "stick" anyway but everyone will want a great wage (commensurate on their skills - or not) because they have a "certificate". Now - with "interactive diagnostics" we can take trained monkeys and have them fix cars.... well, maybe kinda.... and save ourselves a bundle... We wont have to worry about FIRTFT because the new "dumbed down" wages will only attract people too stupid to know what "scapegoat" means. And the customers will believe nearly anything we are bold enough to state.

 

Whether this is an experiment or a bold move forward.... it worries me.... It is cause for concern for both "us" and for our customers....

 

Like John DeLorean or Lee Iaccoca, I'm sure I could write a novel about this trade... not with the "insider" view of the aforementioned movers and shakers... but with the jaundiced eye of an old fart that has seen things come and things go - and while some of these comings and goings were big deals in my world - they were ho-hum for Joe Consumer.

 

What it is boiling down to - the consumer is simply one member in a flock of sheep.... He will be fleeced when it is his turn.

 

Years ago - I would back my car into a parking spot and turn on my headlights.... A sweet young thing in a mini-skirt (barely below "see" level) would come out and take my order. At this point, we would light a cigarette (something I haven't had in over two weeks, I might add) - when it was about done - the sweet young thing would reappear bearing tray. On this tray would be a chunk of dead cow... REAL dead cow.. cooked and decorated to my specs.... Back then "I" mattered....

 

Today... they pull a shingle from under the heat lamp - this is the way "everybody" eats them - sorry, no substitutions and no special orders... If you fucking customers would stop expecting special treatment, we could make some healthy profits here.... Life would be so much better without customers....

 

So... where is the old guy going with this tirade? Think, boys and girls... we only need to think. The psychologists and behaviour analysts are in control of most peoples lives... Many of you don't stand a chance against a well placed, well constructed advertising campaign.... and it doesn't stop with consumer goods....

 

If you don't excell at your chosen craft... if you aren't honest.... if you lack insight and foresight.... you may, one day, be replaced by "interactive diagnostics".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's all well and good, but time will tell if it will get used, How will Ford ever know if the guided diagnostics is actually being used and whether it is effective? I care about my job and my career so I am going to put my best into training and whatever else to stay on top of things but do I really need an interactive manual. no. As it is I find myself asking whether the pp test i am on makes sense before proceeding. Maybe I will try it a few times before deciding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I view this thing with optimism. I have been to the diagnostic rodeo quite a few times in my career. So if I am following a pinpoint test I know to have the evtm open and verifying what is being asked of me test. If an ohm check is required I know I need to be load testing and or voltage dropping the circuit in question.

 

With that said let's say I don't have an '09 pc/ed in the shop and I am just a poor 'ol country boy so I don't have a lap top and the nearest computer is in the break room. If I am working on a brand new whatever and I have to diag a code I've never heard of and the pinpoint test has a boat load of yes/no deals, then I am going to save a lot of walking if I can do it all from the IDS on the driver's seat.

 

Now I see that as a gigantic benefit. /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/thumbup.gif

 

For all that see it differently then we just agree to disagee. /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/grin.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As it is I find myself asking whether the pp test i am on makes sense before proceeding. Maybe I will try it a few times before deciding.

You should always be thinking about what you are doing, what you are working on and what the book is telling, or asking you to do. I am a big believer in using the manual, BUT, if you are not analyzing the diagnostics as you are going along you can get tripped up easily and end up going in the wrong direction. My point is that using guided diagnostics can turn a tech into a mindless drone with a probe in hand. This is not a step in the right direction. If a tech chooses to use the guided diag it can help re-enforce the diagnostic process. I see the potential for good and the potential for bad. And as Jim and Bruce frequently point out, circuit and ground testing is not always best performed with just a DVOM. /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/2cents.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you don't excel at your chosen craft... if you aren't honest.... if you lack insight and foresight.... you may, one day, be replaced by "interactive diagnostics".

Nice point, but insight and foresight cannot be taught, only learned from experience. This is what a junior technician can't do- I call it "reading between the lines". Brad made a nice point of checking VD on a circuit the PPT calls for ohming.

 

 

/forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/grin.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The way I see it, if you are going to use the PP test anyhow, it just saves time by inserting the test results in the PP test onscreen. It is still up to the tech to decide what the results mean and which test step to go to next. If you don't agree with the test to begin with then it is up to you to use your head for more than a hat rack and figure out what to do on your own. It does not automatically go to the next step based on the results obtained from the previous test. /forums/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/2cents.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PPT??? How bad do we need them? More precisely.... how bad "should" we need them.

 

Let's look at different kinds of codes (and I'd love to find a definitive list of code suffixes - you know, like P0404-60F or what have you)... We can have a code that is an electrical failure... should be fairly easy.... We can have a code that is a "range/performance" failure... a little tougher because an "unexpected" sensor reading could be electrical or mechanical - no biggy, we can manage... we can have a code that signals a mechanical failure... or we can have one of those damned "informational" codes....

 

Ford tries to publish a PPT that goes from least intrusive to more intrusive... honorable... So - why in Gods name do they insist on using inappropriate tests when they could as easily publish a description of volt drop testing... or at least drop ship some sort of a variable load tool for proper circuit testing. (I'd love to see things from their point of view - but I can't fit my head that far up my ass....).

 

Will these guided diagnostics results ever make it back to Ma Ford? If you are using the on line manuals.. there's a real good chance.... If you are using OASIS Quick Start.... How will we ever know if big brother is watching?

 

The big deal is that there will come a point in time where you wont need to be smart... and, since you wont need to be smart, you will get paid as much as the kid whose eyes light up when the french fry machine goes "DING". The consumer will get used to service that is even worse than what he gets now... They (we) always do.

 

I'm a bitter old f@ck, ain't I?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

how bout they teach the basics and show the techs how it works, so they can use that piece of gray matter in their skulls for something more than an alcohol sponge?

 

 

pinpoint tests are fucking useless in my personal opinion. i have worked with so many tards that believe soley in what they read or see in a PPT that they overlook the basics, missing the problem!

 

i guess common sense and deductive reasoning strategy are not traits most people have anymore?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...