Jump to content

P167F

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

I would also think with less power/torque output the engine emissions would also be different, as well, possibly not requiring as much heat, or producing more/less emissions depending on load/speed/etc.

 

This kinda makes sense in my head, but it may not make too much sense to someone reading this on the other end of the 'puter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: Aaron
I didn't fail the test, for the record. I just got the two questions wrong about the order of aftertreatment components.

And thats only because you couldn't read my writing Posted Image

I think I fucked up and mixed up which one you wrote down, cab & chassis/pickup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Above a certain GVW, emissions certification has to be done via engine dynamometer since it is considered a "heavy duty" application.

 

Below that GVW, OEMs have the choice of certifying it as "light duty", which is done via chassis dynamometer.

 

The EPA cycles for the light duty vs heavy duty are very different. The light duty spends more time at lighter loads. That way, The OEMs can calibrate for high power and torque numbers without worrying so much about emissions.

Thanks, that does explain some things!

After working for a manufacturer for a long time I still see cost before anything thinking as basis for too many things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...