lmorris Posted November 2, 2015 Share Posted November 2, 2015 I have heard about NOX adsorbers but was under the impression they were far too expensive for automotive use any time soon...or are they... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeR Posted November 3, 2015 Share Posted November 3, 2015 Dodge has used NOx absorbers on their 6.7L engines. VW and International too. Joe 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keith Browning Posted November 4, 2015 Share Posted November 4, 2015 What is the definition of the PIDs? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeR Posted November 4, 2015 Share Posted November 4, 2015 NOX-ADS-REGEN is the PID that shows the NOx Adsorber is being regenned. That happens at temps around 1600F. (I'm not sure if that's the textbook temp, but that's what I've observed on the Dodge Cummins. NOx adsorbers regen in around 15 seconds. NOX-ADS-DESULF shows when it is desulfating the NOX Adsorber. The NOX Adsorber doesn't grab SOx emissions on purpose. It's not a regulated emission. Unfortunately SOx will stick to the NOx Adsorber and keep it from grabbing NOx. SOx can be regenned, but it is at a slightly higher temp, but just as quickly. I'm surprised to see these pids on a 6.7 Ford, if that's what it is connected to. I didn't think they used one. If they are using one, it would only be to grab NOx on a cold start. Once it's running DEF is the reducer. While we're on the subject, can anyone tell me how Ford exhausts put the SCR system before the DPF? They are the only ones doing it that I know of, and as far as I knew soot would pollute the SCR and keep it from working. Joe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amailloux Posted November 4, 2015 Share Posted November 4, 2015 GM puts the SCR before the DPF also. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Saunoras Posted November 4, 2015 Share Posted November 4, 2015 If I recall correctly weren't the early 11-12 cab and chassis vehicles the only ones with the DPF and SCR reversed? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeR Posted November 4, 2015 Share Posted November 4, 2015 If I recall correctly weren't the early 11-12 cab and chassis vehicles the only ones with the DPF and SCR reversed? It was my understanding that the cab and chassis has the DPF first. Only pickups have the SCR first. Joe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeR Posted November 4, 2015 Share Posted November 4, 2015 GM puts the SCR before the DPF also. You are correct (but you already knew that!) I thought Ford was the only one. It's a great idea as long as it works....which it obviously does. Joe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lmorris Posted November 4, 2015 Author Share Posted November 4, 2015 I'm surprised to see these pids on a 6.7 Ford, if that's what it is connected to. I didn't think they used one. If they are using one, it would only be to grab NOx on a cold start. Once it's running DEF is the reducer. Joe It was hooked up to a 2016 F350. Ford does not use them yet....I tried to find those pids in datalogger and they are not there. I have seen other vehicles with pidsin freeze frame data that are not used. Hotline says they are sometimes left behind from testing and development. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Saunoras Posted November 5, 2015 Share Posted November 5, 2015 Attached is the 2011-2012 6.7L Chassis Cab (Narrow Frame) EGT sensor locations and diagnostics "service tips" The pickup uses the SCR before the DPF, apparently all model years are like that. That definitely counts for me learning something today. 2011_2012_67L_EGT.pdf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brad Clayton Posted November 5, 2015 Share Posted November 5, 2015 Some theories I have heard over the years: The SCR was put in front of the DPF on pickups so the extra thermal event could help keep the DPF hot. And the DPF was put in front of the SCR on the cab and chassis so it would be placed under the cab and thus factory controlled for heat shielding as there would be no control over what a body builder installed on the chassis. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeR Posted November 5, 2015 Share Posted November 5, 2015 Some theories I have heard over the years: The SCR was put in front of the DPF on pickups so the extra thermal event could help keep the DPF hot. And the DPF was put in front of the SCR on the cab and chassis so it would be placed under the cab and thus factory controlled for heat shielding as there would be no control over what a body builder installed on the chassis. That makes sense, in both cases. Thanks! Joe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amailloux Posted November 5, 2015 Share Posted November 5, 2015 So I thought he scr was placed before the dpf, but after the catalyst to get it up to temp as fast as possible. When watching the scr data, the ecm commands post injection and the cat lights, then egts 1 and 2 come up pretty rapidly. It takes a quite a while under light load to get egt 3 and up to the 450 plus degrees needed to reduce nox. In stop and go, the dpf can run cooler and only he scr must be kept up to temp reducing fuel consumption and allowing a lower idle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.